What’s been designed here is a project that ensures a fossil fuel agenda, both in the literal and figurative sense.
Department of Labor and Related Agencies
… The Biden Administration, LGBT advocates, and some federal courts have attempted to expand the scope and definition of sex discrimination, based in part on the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County. … and definition of sex discrimination, based in part on the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County. … - page 584
… attorneys and pro-choice advocates have argued since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs Chapter Department of Labor and Related … attorneys and pro-choice advocates have argued since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs … Keep anti-life “benefits” out of … - page 585
… Unless the Supreme Court overrules its - 8930 Unless the Supreme Court overrules its bad precedent, Congress should clarify … - page 586
… this theory on an old NLRB case, Joy Silk, even though the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected mandatory card-check … this theory on an old NLRB case, Joy Silk, even though the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected mandatory card-check … - page 603
Department of Commerce
… census violated the Administrative Procedures Act, the Supreme Court held that the Secretary of Commerce does have broad … census violated the Administrative Procedures Act, the Supreme Court held that the Secretary of Commerce does have … - page 680
Take Action
Press - Supreme Court
Center for American Progress
Project 2025 - Top Issues
Read Project 2025 on top issues:
Medicare, education, health care, climate change, veterans, birth control, Social Security, overtime, agriculture, mifepristone, Israel, small business, school lunches, disabilities, Supreme Court, abortion, the death penalty, porn, immigration
Dive Deeper
Read Project 2025 in an open, online discussion
Read and discuss Project 2025 - the whole thing
Joyce Vance Columns on Project 2025
Law professor and NBC Legal Analyst Joyce Vance covers Project 2025