Page 43

Execut

U.S. Constitution, art. Il, § 1, httos://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/ (accessed February 14, 2023).

ergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law No. 105ision C, Title |, § 151, httos://www.congress.gov/105/plaws/publ277/ ry 15, 2023). Activities, Public Law No. 76-252, 76th Congress, August 2, 1939, ink/pdf/stat/53/STATUTE-53-Pgl147.pdf (accessed March 7, 2023). c Law No. 80-253, 80th Congress, July 26, 1947, https://govtrackus. accessed February 15, 2023). “The National

L 235 - 61 Stat. 496; U.S.C. 402),

mendments of 1949 (63 Stat. 579; 50 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). Later in 1949,

ive Office of the President.” The White

nsc/ (accessed February 15, 2023).

nt of the National Economic Council,” 993), pp. 6189-6190, https://www.govinfo.

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

OF THE PRESIDENT

OF THE UNITED STATES Russ Vought

n its opening words, Article II of the U.S. Constitution makes it abundantly

clear that “[t]he executive power shall be vested in a President of the United

States of America.”! That enormous power is not vested in departments or agencies, in staff or administrative bodies, in nongovernmental organizations or other equities and interests close to the government. The President must set and enforce a plan for the executive branch. Sadly, however, a President today assumes office to find a sprawling federal bureaucracy that all too often is carrying out its own policy plans and preferences—or, worse yet, the policy plans and preferences of a radical, supposedly “woke” faction of the country.

The modern conservative President’s task is to limit, control, and direct the executive branch on behalf of the American people. This challenge is created and exacerbated by factors like Congress’s decades-long tendency to delegate its lawmaking power to agency bureaucracies, the pervasive notion of expert “independence” that protects so-called expert authorities from scrutiny, the presumed inability to hold career civil servants accountable for their performance, and the increasing reality that many agencies are not only too big and powerful, but also increasingly weaponized against the public and a President who is elected by the people and empowered by the Constitution to govern.

In Federalist No. 47, James Madison warned that “[t]he accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”’ Regrettably, that wise and cautionary note describes to a significant degree the modern executive branch, which—whether controlled